Category Archives: GRACO

A Suggested Solution for Additional Parking for Graco is a Ramp on One of its Own Parking Lots

The following recommendation by MPRB President Liz Wielinski was posted on the Issues List on March 2, 2015.

A Suggested Solution for Additional Parking for Graco is a Ramp on One of its Own Parking Lots

I would recommend that everyone look at the hybrid map attached to this link at Hennepin County

http://gis.hennepin.us/property/map/default.aspx?pid=1502924410014

if you zoom out a bit you will be able to see the 8 surface parking lots that go from Plymouth at the south to Broadway at the north.  All of these are owned by GRACO and would provide ample room for a new HQ, and room for additional manufacturing capacity all with views to the river and downtown if they chose to create one ramp to serve their suburban employees from Minnetrista and other locales.  It isn’t lack of respect for Graco it is wondering why in this town that abhors surface parking why this is considered OK instead of preserving parkland (and yes it is still zoned industrial because there is no PARK zoning in Minneapolis. Parks can be located in any zoning).

Liz Wielinski
Park Commissioner for the Eastside

Graco is Unfairly Holding Trail Hostage

The following commentary by Jenny Fortman was submitted to and published by the Star Tribune on February 22, 2015.  Jenny Fortman is a board member of the Sheridan  Neighborhood Organization.

Graco is Unfairly Holding Trail Hostage

The company got what it wanted 15 years ago. Now it’s time to honor its commitment for an easement.

Graco Inc. is taking advantage of a quickly approaching funding deadline to manipulate the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board to sell riverfront parkland or risk losing the funding for a much-needed and long-awaited trail connection. In his Feb. 18 commentary (“Graco is happy to negotiate on land Park Board wants for trail”) defending Graco’s bullying of the Park Board and the community, Bill Blazar of the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce suggests we look at history.

In 2000, Graco was granted special permission to build its headquarters right on the Mississippi River, very close to the water. In exchange, Graco was asked to provide an easement for a pedestrian and bicycle trail behind the building. In a letter on Aug. 4, 2000, Robert M. Mattison, Graco’s vice president, general counsel and secretary, said:

“Graco hereby undertakes to work with the city of Minneapolis and/or the Minneapolis Park Board to locate a corridor and grant an easement for a parkway, including bicycle/pedestrian path and vehicle road, on the property of Graco west of the Riverside facility. This easement will be granted for such a corridor to run under the Broadway bridge next to the Mississippi River, and will be granted when the city of Minneapolis and/or the Minneapolis Park Board is ready to proceed with the construction of such a path/road….”Even Blazar’s article concedes that “[Graco] has said on numerous occasions that it is willing to provide an easement.” He neglects to mention that it has never before tried to attach any requirements to purchase parkland to expand its headquarters.

For 130 years, the Park Board has been working to create and protect our shore land and waterways as public amenities. In Minneapolis, there are very few private properties on shore land. The Park Board buys up shore properties and creates parks, as properties become available, focusing on certain areas for planning and development.
Continue reading

Re: [Mpls] Mill City Times- Graco’s broken promise

The following piece was posted on the Issues List on February 23, 2015 by Bob Carney, former candidate for Minneapolis mayor and Lobbyist for “We the People.”

Re: [Mpls] Mill City Times- Graco’s broken promise

 

I’m glad to see the Star Tribune published Jenny Fortman’s Commentary article, but to me three things are missing.  First, it’s important to keep in mind that Graco’s commitment to provide the easement was part of a Tax Increment Financing deal in which Graco received financing that I think was valued at about $1 million.  Second, the Planning Commission’s document established as a condition of that deal that Graco WOULD provide the easement — actually two easements, one for a trail, the other for a road.  The point is that this deal was, and is, a contract, in writing, involving land.  Graco has a legal obligation according to the contract — counter arguments can be made, but I think the starting point is clearly that a contract exists.

Third, in 2011 Graco provided a letter to the Park Board supporting the plan that is going forward now, and stating Graco had ALREADY provided a trail corridor.

I don’t have any problem with trying to be nice and encourage Graco to “do the right thing” — but I think this situation has reached a point where we need to start talking about Graco’s legal obligation, and the harm Graco could cause if the Federal money is lost.

 

I’ll plan on following up on this with a more detailed post.

Minneapolis Park Board Votes on Taking Back NE Riverfront Property from Graco

The following story was reported by Beth McDonough for KSTP-TV on February 18, 2015.

Minneapolis Park Board Votes on Taking Back NE Riverfront Property from Graco

Minneapolis_Park_Board_Votes_on_Taking_Back_NE_Riverfront_Property_from_Graco-syndImport-082712

Link to video:

http://kstp.com/article/stories/s3710544.shtml

A stalemate between the Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board and manufacturing giant, Graco came to a head Wednesday.

The site is next to Graco’s headquarters in Northeast Minneapolis along the Mississippi River.
At a public meeting Wednesday, the Park Board considered taking the land through eminent domain.

Right now, Graco owns the land. The Minneapolis Park Board wants it as an easement to expand a recreational trail from Boom Island further north. It’s an issue close to home for Northeast resident Jenny Fortman, “it’s a critical piece to connect Minneapolis into the bike trail system and make the river an amenity it should be.”

Continue reading

Board, Graco At Odds Over Trail Expansion

The following article was aired and posted on WCCO-TV on Wednesday, February 18, 2015.

Click the link below for associated video:

http://minnesota.cbslocal.com/video?autoStart=true&topVideoCatNo=default&clipId=11151595

Board, Graco At Odds Over Trail Expansion

The Minneapolis Parks and Recreation Board approved a resolution Wednesday night to help settle a land dispute that is holding up plans to expand the trail system along the Mississippi River in Minneapolis.

The decision means the conflict, which centers around a stretch of land on the east bank of the river, will likely end up in the hands of a judge.

The area is between Sheridan Park and Boom Island Park. The property is owned by Graco, a northeast Minneapolis manufacturing company.
Continue reading

Park Board, Graco Lock Horns Over Mississippi Trail, New HQ

The following article by Mark Reilly was published in the February 17, 2015 edition of the
Minneapolis / St. Paul Business Journal.

Park Board, Graco Lock Horns Over Mississippi Trail, New HQ

The Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board is considering seizing land owned by Graco Inc. through eminent domain while the manufacturer seeks a deal that will let it expand its riverside headquarters.

Finance & Commerce reports on the stalemate, which centers on nearly 2 acres of Graco property at its headquarters in Northeast Minneapolis. The Park Board wants to use it as an easement for a trail along the river. When Graco (NYSE: GGG) last expanded its headquarters in 2000, it offered to provide land for the easement. But that deal was never finalized, the Star Tribune notes, and the company says the city waived the requirement years ago.

Now, Graco is offering the land again, but as part of a package deal that gives it some Park Board property on the former site of Scherer Brothers Lumber Co.

GRACO’S CODE OF ETHICS

GRACO’S CODE OF ETHICS

One of the major topics on this Wednesday’s MPRB agenda is Graco and their reneging on their agreement with the Park Board.   Park Board Commissioner Scott Vreeland has suggested in a post to the Issues List that the public might want to remind Graco of its own code of ethics that states “good ethics is good business.”  And he quotes from their website their code, suggesting that the public might want to remind Graco of their code which is quoted below.

“Graco is committed to conducting its worldwide business according to the highest standards of ethics and integrity. This commitment stems not only from a  desire to avoid the many problems ethical violations can create, but more  importantly from a conviction that good ethics is good business. If you know of, or suspect, a violation of Graco’s Conduct of Business Guidelines, or a violation of any law, you should do one of the  following: Call, write or e-mail Graco’s Vice President and General Counsel.
Karen P.  Gallivan
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary Graco Inc.
88  11th Ave. NE
Minneapolis, MN 55413
Phone: 612-623-6604
E-mail: _kgallivan@graco.com_ (mailto:kgallivan@graco.com)

Submitted by Arlene Fried
Co-founder of Park Watch

GRACO RENEGES ON AGREEMENT WITH MPRB

GRACO RENEGES ON AGREEMENT WITH MPRB

Park Watch has just learned that Graco is refusing to follow through on their agreement with the Minneapolis Park Board to grant an easement for a riverfront trail.  They also received a subsidy from the City of $730,000 as part of the deal.

Here is a link to the Mill City Times article.

WITH RIVERFRONT BIKE & PED TRAILS AT STAKE, GRACO MUST LIVE UP TO ITS AGREEMENT

http://millcitytimes.com/opinion/breaking-with-riverfront-bike-ped-trails-at-stake-graco-must.html