Since the Planning Commission denied DeLaSalle, they are once again pursuing an appeal to the city council. Seems that even though the knowledgeable staff of both the HPC and the Planning Commission say "bad idea," the political will says "they gotta have it." One item that DeLaSalle managed to quash was the issue of parking. Their consultants claim they have the requisite number of spaces. The problem is that some of these spaces are no longer viable for parking or they are triple booked. Without being subject to city review, the MPRB can come in and pave over as much park as they like.
DeLaSalle has submitted 6 Eastman, 100-220-224 E Island, and the block at 9 Merriam as DeLaSalle Athletic Facility parking, as well as its own parking lot. It won't be required as a condition on the conditional use permit -- that would mean DLS would have to yield its parking to the public for Athletic Facility use. 6 Eastman and the E Island parcels were part of the EAW. Their traffic consultant added 9 Merriam in a letter to the Planning Commission.
The MPRB turned over 6 Eastman to DeLaSalle in 1999 -- this was politely called an encroachment in the Planning report. The East Island lots were supposed to be a trail along the top of the bluff but MPRB never did the work. It's parkland, not a real parking lot. DeLaSalle is the primary user for both event and daily student parking, though the Pavilion and MPRB also use this lot. Closed to the public. The 9 Merriam block was paved in 2003 for the Pavilion tenant and this gated lot was closed to the public. The MPRB took down the event-only parking sign in May 2007. They didn't take down the gate and no signs are posted so it still looks off limits.
The public should know that it is a lot more than one parcel, that we are promising DeLaSalle parking for 70 years.